袁炜. PLSR和PCR在精煤发热量检测中的研究[J]. 选煤技术, 2020, 48(6): 26-29. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2020.06.006
    引用本文: 袁炜. PLSR和PCR在精煤发热量检测中的研究[J]. 选煤技术, 2020, 48(6): 26-29. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2020.06.006
    YUAN Wei. Study of PLSR and PCR for determination of calorific value of clean coal[J]. Coal Preparation Technology, 2020, 48(6): 26-29. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2020.06.006
    Citation: YUAN Wei. Study of PLSR and PCR for determination of calorific value of clean coal[J]. Coal Preparation Technology, 2020, 48(6): 26-29. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2020.06.006

    PLSR和PCR在精煤发热量检测中的研究

    Study of PLSR and PCR for determination of calorific value of clean coal

    • 摘要: 为了快速检测精煤发热量,采集120个精煤样品的近红外光谱,利用学生氏残差方法剔除异常光谱,建立了偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和主成分回归(PCR)定量分析模型,并结合不同光谱预处理方法对比了两模型的建模效果。研究结果表明:两种模型均达到了良好效果,相比之下PLSR模型建模效果优于PCR模型。经标准归一化(SNV)预处理后的PLSR模型效果最佳,校正集和预测集相关系数分别达到0.96和0.91,校正集均方根误差(RMSEC)和预测集均方根误差(PMSEP)分别为0.001 7和0.003。

       

      Abstract: For rapid determination of calorific value of clean coal, the near-infrared spectra of 120 clean coal samples are collected. After the abnormal spectrum, if any, is eliminated using studentized residual method, quantitative analysis models of partial least squares regression (PLSR) and principal component regression (PCR) are established, and their modelling effects are compared with different spectral preprocessing methods. As evidenced by result of study, though both models are good in modelling effect, the PLSR model is comparatively superior to the PCR model in performance; and through standard normal variety preprocessing, the PLSR modelling effect can be further optimized with the correlation coefficients of calibration and prediction being up to 0.96 and 0.91 respectively and their mean square errors being as low as 0.001 7 and 0.003 respectively.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回