吴思萍, 李振, 吴燕, 刘德武, 于跃先, 常静, 赵凯. 煤炭燃前脱硫技术的发展及展望[J]. 选煤技术, 2021, 49(3): 1-9. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2021.03.001
    引用本文: 吴思萍, 李振, 吴燕, 刘德武, 于跃先, 常静, 赵凯. 煤炭燃前脱硫技术的发展及展望[J]. 选煤技术, 2021, 49(3): 1-9. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2021.03.001
    WU Siping, LI Zhen, WU Yan, LIU Dewu, YU Yuexian, CHANG Jing, ZHAO Kai. Development and perspective of the technologies for desulfurization of coal before combustion[J]. Coal Preparation Technology, 2021, 49(3): 1-9. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2021.03.001
    Citation: WU Siping, LI Zhen, WU Yan, LIU Dewu, YU Yuexian, CHANG Jing, ZHAO Kai. Development and perspective of the technologies for desulfurization of coal before combustion[J]. Coal Preparation Technology, 2021, 49(3): 1-9. DOI: 10.16447/j.cnki.cpt.2021.03.001

    煤炭燃前脱硫技术的发展及展望

    Development and perspective of the technologies for desulfurization of coal before combustion

    • 摘要: 煤炭在我国能源消费中占据主体地位,但燃煤易造成环境污染,因此大力发展洁净煤技术尤为重要。文章综述了煤炭燃前脱硫技术方法,主要有物理法、物理化学法、化学法和生物法,其中:物理法主要用于脱除无机硫,对有机硫的脱除效果有限,技术成熟,成本较低,应用广泛;物理化学法适用于无机硫含量高的煤,对有机硫的脱除几乎不起作用,目前有效的脱硫药剂种类较少;化学法既可脱除无机硫,也可脱除有机硫,但会对煤的结构产生一定影响,一些温和的化学脱硫技术,如微波辐射法、超声-电化学浮选法等,在对煤结构影响较小的情况下可取得良好的脱硫效果;生物法虽可同时脱除有机硫和无机硫,但处理时间长,且目前可以用于脱硫的菌群种类较少。分析认为:煤中大部分无机硫可以采用物理法或物理化学法有效脱除;有机硫只能采用化学法或生物法脱除,鉴于生物法脱硫周期较长,煤炭中的有机硫宜采用一些温和的化学法脱除。今后应在现有技术的基础上大力攻关煤炭的燃前脱硫技术,同时将燃中、燃后脱硫技术作为辅助方法,以实现煤炭的清洁高效利用。

       

      Abstract: Coal occupies a dominant position in energy consumption in China. Yet combustion of coal is liable to cause environmental pollution. To vigorously develop clean coal technology is therefore of vital importance. The paper presents an overview of the related technical means for desulfurization of coal before combustion. These include mainly the physical, chemical, physiochemical and biological methods. Among them, the physical method, a widely applied mature and cost-effective technology, is mainly used for removal of inorganic sulfur, but for the removal of organic sulfur, its effect is limited. The physiochemical method is suitable for the treatment of coal with a high content of inorganic sulfur because it is only effective for removal of such sulfur, but it can hardly produce any effect in removal of organic sulfur. The chemical method can be used for the removal of both inorganic and organic sulfur, but its use can affect the structure of coal. The use of some temperate chemical desulfurization methods such as microwave radiation and ultrasonic-electrochemical flotation methods can produce a good desulfurization result with but little adverse effect on coal structure. The biological method, though effective for removal of both organic and inorganic sulfur, needs to have an extended processing time, and only few kinds of flora suitable for desulfurization are currently available. Result of analysis indicates that most of the inorganic sulfur can be effectively removed using either physical or physiochemical method while for the removal of organic sulfur, the chemical or biological method is the only option; and as the biological method needs a relatively long treatment cycle, it is advisable to remove the organic sulfur using some less-intense chemical methods. It is pointed out that endeavors should be made in the future to tackling the key technologies for desulfurization of coal prior to its combustion on the basis of the technologies presently available while making the technologies for desulfurization of coal during and after combustion as auxiliary means, so as to realize clean and high-efficiency utilization of coal.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回